In comments, Kooiti Masuda provides the following example of a sequence of headlines describing the same research:
The original paper: M. Ogi, K. Yamazaki, and J.M. Wallace, 2010: Influence of winter and summer surface wind anomalies on summer Arctic sea ice extent. Geophysical Research Letters, 37, L07701. (No. 13 as listed here).See also this famous PhD comic whence the image snip.
Nature (research highlights, 18 March 2010): Geoscience: Wind-blown ice. (Nature's short headlines are like riddles, and I do not want to comment on this. I just include it for its content which the journalists probably read.)
Guardian (David Adam, 22 March): Wind contributing to Arctic sea ice loss, study finds. (Fair headline.)
Telegraph (Geoffrey Lean): Good news as research suggests global warming does not directly cause all the melting of Arctic ice. (This is a commentary in a blog, and the headline shows what the commentator thought rather than what the paper said.)
Daily Mail: Arctic winds and not global warming 'responsible for much of record loss of sea ice'. (Misleading.)
Fox News: Winds, Not Warming, Leading to Arctic Ice Melt. (False.)