tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8524070301101240472.post1063800615290193144..comments2023-09-28T08:13:11.489-07:00Comments on Only In It For The Gold: For the Misleading Headline FileMichael Tobishttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08229460438349093944noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8524070301101240472.post-79472223991455726202011-05-17T13:46:03.260-07:002011-05-17T13:46:03.260-07:00A better headline and subheader in an Alberta pape...A better headline and subheader in an Alberta paper:<br /><br />Freakish weather may be here to stay: <br />Scientists finding more links with climate change<br /><br />http://www.edmontonjournal.com/news/Freakish+weather+here+stay/4794681/story.htmlHolly Stickhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01137842937086115228noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8524070301101240472.post-69995797641504454972011-05-16T16:58:33.455-07:002011-05-16T16:58:33.455-07:00The Australian is the national Murdoch mouthpiece....The Australian is the national Murdoch mouthpiece.<br />Media Watch did a show about the exact same crazy headlines last week: http://www.abc.net.au/iview/#/view/764003Andyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14403692780472016653noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8524070301101240472.post-50118760325587389952011-05-16T14:34:39.853-07:002011-05-16T14:34:39.853-07:00I also had to peek. The issue of how to interpret...I also had to peek. The issue of how to interpret extreme events has even more significance in a country more ravaged than the US, by the events that just happen to be the expected consequences of climate change.<br /><br />The issue is a universal condition that is the same everywhere. And that won't be changing anytime soon.<br /><br />The situation calls for a well reasoned, already prepared, explanation/warning like the Miranda warning or the warning on a package of cigarettes.<br /><br />When it reaches occasional use most reporters and copy editors (but not those at The Australian) will lose the ability to become creative with that part of the interview.Same Ordinary Foolhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07688744006745904247noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8524070301101240472.post-86238154165194500972011-05-16T14:06:34.982-07:002011-05-16T14:06:34.982-07:00The relevance of the comment about it...The <b>relevance of the</b> comment about it...byron smithhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17938334606675769903noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8524070301101240472.post-5861809471942255832011-05-16T14:05:34.968-07:002011-05-16T14:05:34.968-07:00The comment about it being the Australian is that ...The comment about it being the <i>Australian</i> is that that publication over the last few years has developed a very strong reputation for all kinds of journalistic trickery and shoddiness regarding climate stories. They have a fairly openly denialist editorial policy and see no problem in pushing this at pretty much every opportunity.<br /><br />The link is to a blog that has been faithfully recording these abuses in some detail.<br /><br />Apologies if this is all old news and you are already quite familiar with Deltoid and the <i>Australian</i>, but I thought I'd put in my 2p in case you weren't.byron smithhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17938334606675769903noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8524070301101240472.post-4050340088059273602011-05-16T11:59:00.692-07:002011-05-16T11:59:00.692-07:00Sure, but it's also an example of the copy edi...Sure, but it's also an example of the copy editor completely overriding the actual news with spin.Michael Tobishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08229460438349093944noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8524070301101240472.post-27372717635552723892011-05-16T11:45:31.382-07:002011-05-16T11:45:31.382-07:00C'mon, man, it's THE AUSTRALIAN:
The Aust...C'mon, man, it's THE AUSTRALIAN:<br /><br />The Australian's War on Science 45<br />http://scienceblogs.com/deltoid/2010/02/the_australians_war_on_science_47.phpSteve Scolnikhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11887989345192863494noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8524070301101240472.post-34316620071805834582011-05-16T11:35:19.777-07:002011-05-16T11:35:19.777-07:00Not that the reporter was blameless: "said th...Not that the reporter was blameless: "said the general observation that climate change was bringing about an increase in extreme weather events was valid but scientists needed to provide much finer detail" What does that mean?<br /><br />Still, the headline is a fine example of unfair editorializing by the copy editor. And I expect Pachauri will prove correct that "these events ... are taking place at much higher frequency and intensity".<br /><br />But is he correct to assert that "On that there is very little doubt; the scientific evidence is very, very strong"? Can anyone quote chapter and verse on that?Michael Tobishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08229460438349093944noreply@blogger.com