tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8524070301101240472.post5918813621532694241..comments2023-09-28T08:13:11.489-07:00Comments on Only In It For The Gold: Wherein our Hero Finally Makes Nature MagazineMichael Tobishttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08229460438349093944noreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8524070301101240472.post-35756403463693558772011-04-02T12:17:35.566-07:002011-04-02T12:17:35.566-07:00ahem, my 2c: egos, like sex, are best indulged in ...ahem, my 2c: egos, like sex, are best indulged in private.<br /><br />...as are comments like this one, better not to publish it...Anna Hayneshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15176850465809297298noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8524070301101240472.post-84838019858740992982011-04-01T18:17:12.174-07:002011-04-01T18:17:12.174-07:00They would have been far better off getting Micahe...They would have been far better off getting Micahel to write that article.Steve Bloomhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12943109973917998380noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8524070301101240472.post-9779461322903035362011-04-01T05:29:14.617-07:002011-04-01T05:29:14.617-07:00Where is RC? :-)Where is RC? :-)Alexander Achttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16845172528191878930noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8524070301101240472.post-26093817260949444632011-03-31T22:52:44.643-07:002011-03-31T22:52:44.643-07:00y'all are just jealousy'all are just jealousWilliam Thttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13285679538054366979noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8524070301101240472.post-74568048453705731262011-03-31T21:56:24.552-07:002011-03-31T21:56:24.552-07:00Blogwhoring in Nature has to be a first, however y...Blogwhoring in Nature has to be a first, however you managed to pull it off - too bad it's not working! :)dhogazahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13589109126483161671noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8524070301101240472.post-80544701390799963992011-03-31T19:46:06.850-07:002011-03-31T19:46:06.850-07:00It's a perfect article for 2002. Sadly, it w...It's a perfect article for 2002. Sadly, it was published in 2011.<br /><br />Aside from the silliness of "gosh-wow-people-are-blogging" to a contemporary Internet-literate audience, really, this is one more article that counters "anecdote about person describing his blog as outreach who says it helped him/her get an academic job" with "anecdote about person who may have gone too far and made him or herself look bad". Have these people ever thought of doing science? The thing is published in Nature, after all. Couldn't they do a survey or something?Rich Puchalskyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13565210317964576866noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8524070301101240472.post-76195486896433117732011-03-31T18:36:06.331-07:002011-03-31T18:36:06.331-07:00Well, yeh. Of course.
Hasn't done squat for t...Well, yeh. Of course.<br /><br />Hasn't done squat for traffic in the short run, though. How much would it have cost them for a bleedin link?Michael Tobishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08229460438349093944noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8524070301101240472.post-56783487887844470422011-03-31T16:59:16.651-07:002011-03-31T16:59:16.651-07:00Anything for publicity.Anything for publicity.David B. Bensonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02917182411282836875noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8524070301101240472.post-73304738782749306202011-03-31T10:11:17.409-07:002011-03-31T10:11:17.409-07:00You?:)You?:)EliRabetthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07957002964638398767noreply@blogger.com