tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8524070301101240472.post781394278119776670..comments2023-09-28T08:13:11.489-07:00Comments on Only In It For The Gold: Delusionist Arguments RankedMichael Tobishttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08229460438349093944noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8524070301101240472.post-57925979462598718162007-08-20T22:19:00.000-07:002007-08-20T22:19:00.000-07:00There's an earlier document by the Royal Society h...There's an earlier document by the Royal Society <A HREF="http://www.royalsoc.ac.uk/downloaddoc.asp?id=1630" REL="nofollow">here</A> that still may be worth John knowing about (in addition to the climate change controversies he already has noted).<BR/><BR/>Also, there are several sites that list and counter arguments found in TGGWS, such as <A HREF="http://www.jri.org.uk/news/Critique_Channel4_Global_Warming_Swindle.pdf" REL="nofollow">this document</A> by Sir John Houghton.<BR/><BR/>I think it is a good idea to index these resources.<BR/><BR/>Would he consider including YouTube clips in his index? I tend to collect them, as I know kids are more likely to watch a video online than read a document.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com