tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8524070301101240472.post4735579722955312350..comments2023-09-28T08:13:11.489-07:00Comments on Only In It For The Gold: Is There a Swarm Solution?Michael Tobishttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08229460438349093944noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8524070301101240472.post-13840758423574940712011-09-16T13:23:52.612-07:002011-09-16T13:23:52.612-07:00Yes, I agree, but on the other hand, it is a step ...Yes, I agree, but on the other hand, it is a step in the right direction. We have to somehow imagine a crowded world with dignity. <br /><br />Else we will lose the dignity quickly and eventually we will kill off the crowd.<br /><br />And somehow the internet has to play a role in the positive changes.<br /><br />So I don't disagree with what they say, and I feel that the way they are saying it is at least partly helpful in that they try to find a hopeful vision.<br /><br />But it had better be more convincing than this or it will just discourage people.Michael Tobishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08229460438349093944noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8524070301101240472.post-85556097682546583102011-09-16T12:46:13.515-07:002011-09-16T12:46:13.515-07:00I first saw this film about a year ago and I was a...I first saw this film about a year ago and I was a bit nonplussed by the nebulous call to action. It seems to lose it's way half way through. Sure, it showcases the skills of the filmmakers but I'm not convinced (at all) they really have understod the dimensions of the problem. The problem Im referring to btw is the yawning gap between where the scientists are at on AGW and where the public are on it and where the politicians are on it, (note to self:a three way mexican stand off springs to mind). It's an absorbing conundrum anyhow, and IMHO this film doesnt do the problem justice <i>ergo</i> it downplays it.hengist mcstonehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02305004072053789291noreply@blogger.com